Panshi
EN/

Home / Comparisons

Lakera Guard vs LLM Guard (Protect AI)

Quick verdict

Key difference: LLM Guard (Protect AI) is open-source while Lakera Guard is proprietary.

Side-by-side comparison from the Agent Observability Index: licensing, self-hosting, pricing model and integrations — no vendor copy, primary sources linked.

Lakera GuardLLM Guard (Protect AI)
One-linerLow-latency API guarding against prompt injection, data leakage and toxic content, backed by the Gandalf attack dataset.Open-source input/output scanner toolkit (35+ scanners) for PII, injection and toxicity checks on LLM traffic.
CategoryGuardrails & SafetyGuardrails & Safety
OpenTelemetry-native
Open sourceNoYes
Self-hostableYesYes
Pricing modelfreemiumfree
Pricing notesFree community API tier; enterprise SLA-backed plansMIT OSS scanners free; enterprise via Palo Alto Networks (Protect AI acquisition)
Frameworksopenai-sdk, anthropic, langchainopenai-sdk, langchain
GitHub stars3.1k
Maturity (GitHub signal)— (no public repo)64/100 (Established)
Funding / ownershipAcquired by Check Point (2025); previously $30M raisedProtect AI acquired by Palo Alto Networks (2025)

How to choose

Sources: Lakera Guard · LLM Guard (Protect AI)

Frequently asked questions

Is Lakera Guard or LLM Guard (Protect AI) open source?

Lakera Guard: No. LLM Guard (Protect AI): Yes.

Can Lakera Guard and LLM Guard (Protect AI) be self-hosted?

Lakera Guard: Yes. LLM Guard (Protect AI): Yes.

Lakera Guard vs LLM Guard (Protect AI): which should I choose?

Key difference: LLM Guard (Protect AI) is open-source while Lakera Guard is proprietary.