Panshi
EN/

Home / Comparisons

Langfuse vs MLflow (Tracing & GenAI)

Quick verdict

Langfuse and MLflow (Tracing & GenAI) are closely matched on licensing, self-hosting and OpenTelemetry support — the decision comes down to pricing and framework integrations below.

Side-by-side comparison from the Agent Observability Index: licensing, self-hosting, pricing model and integrations — no vendor copy, primary sources linked.

LangfuseMLflow (Tracing & GenAI)
One-linerOpen-source (MIT) LLM engineering platform combining tracing, prompt management, evals and datasets, widely used as the default self-hosted observability stack.The MLOps standard's GenAI extension: trace logging, LLM evaluation and prompt registry inside open-source MLflow 3.
CategoryObservability & TracingObservability & Tracing
OpenTelemetry-nativeYesYes
Open sourceYesYes
Self-hostableYesYes
Pricing modelfreemiumfree
Pricing notesFree Hobby tier (50k units/mo); Core $29/mo, Pro $199/mo, unlimited users on paid tiers; MIT core fully self-hostableApache-2.0, free; managed versions via Databricks
Frameworkslangchain, openai-sdk, llamaindex, litellm, opentelemetry, vercel-ai, haystackopenai-sdk, langchain, llamaindex, dspy, anthropic, opentelemetry
GitHub stars29k26.5k
Maturity (GitHub signal)90/100 (Mature)100/100 (Mature)
Funding / ownershipYC W23; $4M seed (Lightspeed, La Famiglia)Linux Foundation project, primarily backed by Databricks

How to choose

Sources: Langfuse · MLflow (Tracing & GenAI)

Frequently asked questions

Is Langfuse or MLflow (Tracing & GenAI) open source?

Langfuse: Yes. MLflow (Tracing & GenAI): Yes.

Can Langfuse and MLflow (Tracing & GenAI) be self-hosted?

Langfuse: Yes. MLflow (Tracing & GenAI): Yes.

Langfuse vs MLflow (Tracing & GenAI): which should I choose?

Langfuse and MLflow (Tracing & GenAI) are closely matched on licensing, self-hosting and OpenTelemetry support — the decision comes down to pricing and framework integrations below.