Panshi
EN/

Home / Comparisons

Opik (Comet) vs Langfuse

Quick verdict

Key difference: Langfuse is OpenTelemetry-native (no lock-in) while Opik (Comet) uses a proprietary SDK.

Side-by-side comparison from the Agent Observability Index: licensing, self-hosting, pricing model and integrations — no vendor copy, primary sources linked.

Opik (Comet)Langfuse
One-linerOpen-source LLM evaluation and tracing platform from Comet, combining trace logging, eval metrics and CI-friendly test suites.Open-source (MIT) LLM engineering platform combining tracing, prompt management, evals and datasets, widely used as the default self-hosted observability stack.
CategoryObservability & TracingObservability & Tracing
OpenTelemetry-nativeNoYes
Open sourceYesYes
Self-hostableYesYes
Pricing modelfreemiumfreemium
Pricing notesApache-2.0 self-host free; Comet cloud free tier + paid plansFree Hobby tier (50k units/mo); Core $29/mo, Pro $199/mo, unlimited users on paid tiers; MIT core fully self-hostable
Frameworksopenai-sdk, langchain, llamaindex, litellm, dspy, haystacklangchain, openai-sdk, llamaindex, litellm, opentelemetry, vercel-ai, haystack
GitHub stars19.6k29k
Maturity (GitHub signal)100/100 (Mature)90/100 (Mature)
Funding / ownershipBacked by Comet ML ($50M Series B, 2021)YC W23; $4M seed (Lightspeed, La Famiglia)

How to choose

Sources: Opik (Comet) · Langfuse

Frequently asked questions

Is Opik (Comet) or Langfuse open source?

Opik (Comet): Yes. Langfuse: Yes.

Can Opik (Comet) and Langfuse be self-hosted?

Opik (Comet): Yes. Langfuse: Yes.

Opik (Comet) vs Langfuse: which should I choose?

Key difference: Langfuse is OpenTelemetry-native (no lock-in) while Opik (Comet) uses a proprietary SDK.