Panshi
EN/

Home / Comparisons

Helicone vs OpenLIT

Quick verdict

Key difference: OpenLIT is OpenTelemetry-native (no lock-in) while Helicone uses a proprietary SDK.

Side-by-side comparison from the Agent Observability Index: licensing, self-hosting, pricing model and integrations — no vendor copy, primary sources linked.

HeliconeOpenLIT
One-linerProxy/gateway-based LLM logging with one-line setup, unified cost and latency visibility across providers; now under Mintlify ownership.OpenTelemetry-native open-source platform covering LLM tracing, GPU monitoring, guardrails and a prompt vault with one-line auto-instrumentation of 50+ providers.
CategoryObservability & TracingObservability & Tracing
OpenTelemetry-nativeNoYes
Open sourceYesYes
Self-hostableYesYes
Pricing modelfreemiumfree
Pricing notesFree tier + per-seat paid plans; reported in maintenance mode after Mintlify acquisition (Mar 2026)Apache-2.0, fully free self-hosted; no managed cloud tier
Frameworksopenai-sdk, anthropic, langchain, litellm, vercel-aiopentelemetry, openai-sdk, anthropic, langchain, llamaindex, ollama
GitHub stars5.8k2.5k
Maturity (GitHub signal)97/100 (Mature)92/100 (Mature)
Funding / ownershipYC W23; acquired by Mintlify (Mar 2026)

How to choose

Sources: Helicone · OpenLIT

Frequently asked questions

Is Helicone or OpenLIT open source?

Helicone: Yes. OpenLIT: Yes.

Can Helicone and OpenLIT be self-hosted?

Helicone: Yes. OpenLIT: Yes.

Helicone vs OpenLIT: which should I choose?

Key difference: OpenLIT is OpenTelemetry-native (no lock-in) while Helicone uses a proprietary SDK.